![]() ![]() Here, we are not primarily concerned with the respective arguments of Anomaly and Wilson, but with the higher-level question of whether ‘eugenics’ can be defended at all. Robert Wilson ( 2019), in turn, offered a reply with the title ‘Eugenics Undefended’ in which he criticized almost every premise in Anomaly’s paper. ![]() Petitions condemning the paper were initiated and activists on social media denounced Anomaly’s paper and called for him to be fired. Recently, the Monash Bioethics Review published an article titled ‘Defending eugenics: From cryptic choice to conscious selection’ (Anomaly 2018), a paper that caused a stir among some in the academic community. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |